<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negative Blogging versus Positive Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moremerchant.com/negative-blogging-versus-positive-blogging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moremerchant.com/negative-blogging-versus-positive-blogging</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essie</title>
		<link>http://moremerchant.com/negative-blogging-versus-positive-blogging/comment-page-1#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>Essie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moremerchant.com/negative-blogging-versus-positive-blogging#comment-2581</guid>
		<description>Hello,

Good question. I suppose one could choose only topics about which one had nothing but positive things to say. here is that style. A blog which has a variety of tones, or is negative occasionally comes across as more human which is more personal. I think this is a plus in the short run, and in the long run, how does anyone&#039;s positive tome mean anything if there is nothing contrasting? I think it becomes hollow, and probably bland as well. Integrity may require being critical at times. 
If one has a thematic content which is say, something like &quot;bringing the best of &#039;x,y, or z&#039; to one&#039;s readers,&quot; then all-positive has integrity because all but what you blog about is impliedly criticized!

There are my thoughts on your question. Great site, just keep it up. :)   Essie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Good question. I suppose one could choose only topics about which one had nothing but positive things to say. here is that style. A blog which has a variety of tones, or is negative occasionally comes across as more human which is more personal. I think this is a plus in the short run, and in the long run, how does anyone&#8217;s positive tome mean anything if there is nothing contrasting? I think it becomes hollow, and probably bland as well. Integrity may require being critical at times.<br />
If one has a thematic content which is say, something like &#8220;bringing the best of &#8216;x,y, or z&#8217; to one&#8217;s readers,&#8221; then all-positive has integrity because all but what you blog about is impliedly criticized!</p>
<p>There are my thoughts on your question. Great site, just keep it up. <img src='http://moremerchant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    Essie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.808 seconds -->

