<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compete.com or Alexa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Cash</title>
		<link>http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa/comment-page-1#comment-3945</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Cash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 05:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa#comment-3945</guid>
		<description>Who follow Complete, Everyone uses Alexa

I keep up with it, but not close</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who follow Complete, Everyone uses Alexa</p>
<p>I keep up with it, but not close</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aldon Hynes</title>
		<link>http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa/comment-page-1#comment-3932</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldon Hynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa#comment-3932</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with David on this.  I&#039;ve always trusted Quantcast best, but it is only good if the sites have added the Quantcast pixel.  The demographic information it supplies is very good, and the numbers seem most reliable.

I like compete.com a bit as well, but they seem to lag in updating their data.

I actually think that Alexa is much more reliable since they made their recent changes, even though it cost me a bit in ranking.

However, the best is to look at all three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with David on this.  I&#8217;ve always trusted Quantcast best, but it is only good if the sites have added the Quantcast pixel.  The demographic information it supplies is very good, and the numbers seem most reliable.</p>
<p>I like compete.com a bit as well, but they seem to lag in updating their data.</p>
<p>I actually think that Alexa is much more reliable since they made their recent changes, even though it cost me a bit in ranking.</p>
<p>However, the best is to look at all three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mullings</title>
		<link>http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa/comment-page-1#comment-3906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mullings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moremerchant.com/competecom-or-alexa#comment-3906</guid>
		<description>I use Compete.com alongside Quantcast.com and Alexa.com because each has their flaws and I would prefer to use multiple sources to identify trends.

We all know that they are not that accurate when it comes down to details, especially Alexa if you have a website with lots of non-US traffic, but they are good to compare your traffic to other sites and judge growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Compete.com alongside Quantcast.com and Alexa.com because each has their flaws and I would prefer to use multiple sources to identify trends.</p>
<p>We all know that they are not that accurate when it comes down to details, especially Alexa if you have a website with lots of non-US traffic, but they are good to compare your traffic to other sites and judge growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.674 seconds -->

